How to cross-examine forensic scientists: a guide for lawyers
[7-1180] Article
G Edmond et al, “How to cross-examine forensic scientists: a guide for lawyers” (2014) 39 Aust Bar Rev 174.
Abstract
This article uses a series of examples to help lawyers explore the probative value of forensic science evidence on the voir dire and at trial. Questions cover topics including relevance, the expression of results, codes of conduct, limitations and errors. It also includes commentary, supported by reference to research and reports, on the reliability and validity of forensic science techniques.
This article was first published by LexisNexis in the Australian Bar Review, (2014) 39 Aust Bar Rev 174.